Peer Review is the base of scientific and fair reviewing of applying proposals which has been held by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). The key rule of the NSFC’s Peer Review is to select the proper experts to review different proposals. As the quickly annual increase of the applying proposals received by the NSFC, the staff of the NSFC have to suffer much heavy workload, especially that they had to finish the choice of experts for more than thousands proposals in quite short time. To enhance the efficiency of the experts’ selection and the assignment of the proposals , NSFC planned to construct the selection of auxiliary system based on an intact expert library, which would promote the treatment of the applying proposals and improve the criterion and fairness and the quality of peer review. .In this program, the main research fields under the normal scientific codes which have been used in the past 10 years would be put forward, the key words closely connected with the scientific problems, research targets, research methods would be also raised and used to construct the library of key words. A new system which includes classified review experts based on the scientific codes--research targets--key words would be constructed which would be used as a peer-review-experts-selected system. The system can both lead the applicants to choose the application code and key words properly and accurately, and help the staff of NSFC in the classification of the proposals and the appointment of the experts efficiently.
“同行评议制”是基金资助工作实现科学、公正的基础。同行评议的关键是选准专家。随着基金申请数量的增加,基金项目管理人员工作强度越来越大,在有限的时间内准确选择同行评议专家的压力日益增加。国家自然科学基金委员会拟构建同行评议专家选择辅助系统,以提高项目受理的效率,保证项目的评审更加规范和公平,确保评审质量。.本项目拟在现行申请代码的基础上,通过学科调研和近10年申请项目信息细化申请代码,提出代码内的主要研究方向,从科学问题、研究对象、研究方法等不同层次挖掘研究方向下的关键词,进而组成学科关键词词库,在同行评议专家选择辅助系统中基于申请代码-研究方向-关键词三个级次标记同行评议专家。引导申请人基于关键词词库准确选择申请代码和关键词,基金管理人以申请书的关键词进行项目分组和指派同行评议专家,搭建基金申请人和评议人共识的学科体系,提高评审工作的效率,增强同行评议专家遴选的科学性,推进评审规范化。
同行评议是基金资助实现科学、公正的基础,而同行评议的关键是对评审专家的选择。为提高项目受理效率,保证项目的评审更加规范和公平,确保评审质量,急需构建一同行评议专家选择辅助系统。本项目分析了近年来申请项目,对现行申请代码进行了修订;细化了主要研究方向,从科学问题、研究对象、研究方法等层次提炼了各研究方向的关键词,构建了学科关键词词库;基于编制的研究方向、关键词词库及修订的学科申请代码,对利用关键词进行专家指派进行了探索。
{{i.achievement_title}}
数据更新时间:2023-05-31
基于分形L系统的水稻根系建模方法研究
监管的非对称性、盈余管理模式选择与证监会执法效率?
拥堵路网交通流均衡分配模型
卫生系统韧性研究概况及其展望
面向云工作流安全的任务调度方法
林学学科同行评议专家选择辅助系统及专家库建设
免疫学科同行评议专家选择辅助系统及专家库系统建设
食品科学学科同行评议专家选择辅助系统及专家库建设
植物保护学学科同行评议专家选择辅助系统及专家库系统建设